---

The suit, filed in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court in Miami-Dade County, Florida, accuses Sun of running a public smear campaign that WLFI says contained materially false statements about the project. WLFI is seeking unspecified monetary damages, legal fees, and a public retraction of Sun's posts. The filing is a direct response to Sun's own federal lawsuit, lodged on April 21 in the Northern District of California, which accused WLFI of breach of contract, fraud, and unlawful control of his assets.

WLFI was co-founded in October 2024 by Donald Trump, Donald Trump Jr., and Eric Trump, and is operationally led by CEO Zach Witkoff and co-founder Chase Herro. Sun, the Chinese-born founder of the TRON blockchain and a billionaire estimated by Forbes to be worth around $8.5 billion, invested roughly $75 million in WLFI and approximately $100 million in the $TRUMP memecoin, giving him about $175 million in total exposure to Trump family crypto ventures. Sun's involvement with WLFI has attracted sustained political scrutiny: the SEC charged him in 2023 with alleged wash trading and unregistered securities sales involving TRX and BTT, but the case was dropped in February 2025, shortly after Trump's inauguration, a sequence widely noted by reporters at Politico and Fortune given the scale of Sun's investment in the project. Sun also served as Grenada's WTO Ambassador from 2021 until 2023, when he lost the diplomatic role following a change in Grenada's government and the onset of the SEC lawsuit.

The immediate trigger for both lawsuits is a token freeze WLFI executed in September 2025. The project locked wallets linked to Sun, trapping an estimated 540 million unlocked tokens and 2.4 billion locked tokens worth approximately $240 million at current market prices. WLFI says Sun violated his investor agreement by transferring around $300 million worth of WLFI tokens to both Binance and HTX. WLFI further alleges that Sun engaged in straw purchases, buying tokens on behalf of other investors in breach of his agreement, and that he engaged in short selling designed to suppress WLFI's price at launch. Sun's lawsuit describes the freeze mechanism differently, characterising it as a hidden administrative backdoor quietly inserted into the smart contract in August 2025 without a governance vote or investor disclosure. WLFI counters that the blacklisting function was disclosed in the original Terms of Sale and represents a standard investor protection tool.

The on-chain data adds context to the dispute. WLFI tokens hit an all-time high of $0.46 in September 2025 and have since dropped between 75 and 86 percent to trade around $0.063 to $0.080 as of May 5, 2026. The project's circulating market cap sits between $2 billion and $2.6 billion, with a fully diluted valuation near $6.3 billion across 100 billion total tokens. WLFI's USD1 stablecoin, launched in March 2025, reached $4.6 billion in circulation by April 2026, a figure that exceeds WLFI's own circulating market cap.

Both sides have been direct in public. Sun called the defamation filing "a meritless PR stunt" and said he stands by his statements. WLFI attorney Tom Clare said: "Rather than acting in good faith, Justin Sun chose to defame World Liberty, repeatedly, publicly, and to millions of followers." Witkoff posted on X that he looks forward to "the truth coming out in court." Sun's own posts, cited by WLFI as central to the defamation claim, accused the project of secretly implanting "backdoor controls over user assets" and treating "the crypto community as a personal ATM."

The dispute carries real consequences beyond the US. In January 2026, Pakistan signed a memorandum of understanding with SC Financial Technologies, a WLFI affiliate, to pilot the USD1 stablecoin for cross-border payments. That deal was negotiated between Witkoff and Pakistani Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb. Pakistani regulators evaluating the USD1 integration will now need to weigh an active legal dispute over whether WLFI's governance disclosures were adequate. The stakes extend further afield as well: regulators in Nigeria, Kenya, and South Africa have separately flagged centralised administrative controls of the kind alleged in Sun's lawsuit as incompatible with genuine decentralised finance principles. Sun, currently based in Hong Kong, operates TRON as critical stablecoin infrastructure across South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, where the network carries more than half of all USDT transactions globally. Any sustained reputational damage to Sun or TRON could affect users in markets where TRON is the dominant low-cost transfer layer.

The case raises a broader precedent question that developers and institutional investors across emerging markets should watch closely: can a token issuer legally block secondary market transfers using on-chain controls, even when those controls are disclosed only in off-chain documents? That question may take considerable time to work through two separate court proceedings, and no public timeline has been established. Adding another layer of complexity, WLFI put forward a governance proposal on April 15, 2026, affecting 62.28 billion locked tokens and introducing a revised two-year cliff plus three-year linear vesting schedule, with a 10 percent burn option for insiders. The proposal surfaced less than a week before Sun filed his federal lawsuit and sits unresolved alongside the litigation.

In the meantime, the dispute offers a practical lesson for any project seeking investors in regulated markets. Undisclosed or ambiguously disclosed admin functions are not just a reputational risk; they are now, demonstrably, a litigation risk as well.