Pakistan's Central Bank Ends Eight-Year Crypto Banking Ban, Opens Accounts for Licensed Firms
State Bank of Pakistan formally lifts 2018 prohibition, allowing regulated banks to service crypto companies for the first time under a new national licensing framework.

The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) issued a directive on April 14, 2026 that formally ends an eight-year prohibition on banks servicing crypto businesses. The new circular, BPRD Circular Letter No. 10 of 2026, supersedes the 2018 order that had barred every SBP-regulated institution, including commercial banks, development finance institutions (DFIs), microfinance banks, and payment operators, from touching virtual currency transactions in any form. Under the updated rules, those same institutions may now open bank accounts for companies that hold a valid license from the Pakistan Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (PVARA), the statutory body created under the Virtual Assets Act 2026.
The shift is significant on its own terms. Pakistan ranks third in Chainalysis's 2025 Global Crypto Adoption Index, up from ninth the year before, and a government report published in February 2026 estimated roughly 40 million Pakistanis use crypto in some form, representing about 17 percent of the population. Despite that scale of activity, the 2018 ban pushed nearly all of it into informal channels. Peer-to-peer crypto trading grew an estimated 700 percent following the original prohibition, and the underground market ballooned to somewhere between $21 billion and $25 billion in estimated size. Users routed remittances through USDT purchased on grey-market platforms, transferred funds to wallets in Dubai or Turkey, and converted back to local currency through what analysts described as a digital hundi (the South Asian informal value-transfer instrument, rooted in paper-based instruments and trust networks, and related to but distinct from the Arabic-origin hawala system).
The new rules do not hand banks unlimited access to the crypto sector. The SBP circular specifies that accounts for licensed crypto firms must be denominated in Pakistani rupees and must not bear interest. Crypto companies are required to hold customer funds in separate Client Money Accounts, keeping those funds strictly segregated from their own operating capital. Cash deposits and withdrawals through those accounts are prohibited, and the accounts cannot be pledged as collateral. Foreign exchange regulations remain in effect without modification, which leaves significant uncertainty for any exchange hoping to process cross-border crypto flows. Critically, banks themselves are still barred from trading, investing in, or holding virtual assets using either their own capital or client funds. The policy legalizes banking services for crypto firms; it does not authorize banks to become crypto participants. For early-stage operators, the framework also provides a supervised regulatory sandbox of up to 18 months, lowering compliance barriers for local startups entering the licensing pipeline. One notable gap: the circular does not directly address purely on-chain, non-custodial activity or decentralized finance protocols, leaving those arrangements in a regulatory grey zone that PVARA has yet to clarify.
PVARA Chairman Bilal Bin Saqib, appointed in December 2025, described the banking directive as part of a broader transition. "With no objection certificates already issued and banking rails being developed in coordination with the State Bank of Pakistan, we are now moving toward a comprehensive licensing framework aligned with global AML and financial integrity standards," he said. The authority itself sits under a multi-regulator governance structure: its board includes the SBP Governor, the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Chairman, and the Federal Board of Revenue Chairman. PVARA can impose fines of up to Rs 100 million or five percent of annual turnover, and it holds powers to compel testimony, conduct searches and seizures, and refer cases for direct criminal prosecution. Foreign exchanges seeking to operate in Pakistan face an additional requirement: PVARA mandates that each licensed entity maintain a resident decision-maker within the country, a condition that will shape market entry strategies for international operators.
The regulatory overhaul has been years in the making, and FATF pressure played a direct role. Pakistan spent 1,576 days on the FATF Grey List between 2018 and 2022, a designation that strained its correspondent banking relationships and cooled foreign investment. The country completed a 34-action remediation plan before being removed from the list in October 2022. The new VASP framework, with its layered AML and know-your-customer requirements for onboarding banks, is widely seen as an effort to demonstrate proactive compliance with FATF Recommendation 15, which covers virtual assets, and to reduce the risk of a future grey listing.
For Pakistan's diaspora communities in the Gulf, the United Kingdom, and North America, the practical stakes center on remittances. Pakistan receives approximately $35 billion in remittances each year, a flow that informal crypto channels have increasingly supplemented. Regulated stablecoin-based remittance services could now emerge as a legal alternative to incumbent wire transfer and hundi channels, potentially lowering costs for millions of households. The government has also signaled broader ambitions: a December 2025 non-binding memorandum of understanding with Binance explored tokenizing $2 billion in state assets including sovereign bonds, T-bills, and commodity reserves, and a separate partnership with World Liberty Financial announced in January 2026 targets the USD1 stablecoin, a USD-pegged product, as a vehicle for expanding Pakistan's digital finance footprint.
For the wider region, Pakistan's transition offers a concrete reference point. India still lacks a comprehensive crypto law despite applying heavy taxation to digital assets. Bangladesh and Sri Lanka maintain outright bans. Nigeria's central bank issued a prohibition circular that closely mirrored Pakistan's 2018 language, yet has not enacted a comparable licensing framework. Pakistan's legislative clarity now arguably places it ahead of India and in closer alignment with jurisdictions such as the UAE, Singapore, and Thailand, all of which have moved to formal VASP licensing regimes in recent years. Whether Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nigeria, and others draw lessons from Islamabad's pivot will depend in part on how smoothly PVARA's licensing pipeline moves from early-stage NOC issuance to a functioning retail market. If the first cohort of licensed exchanges begins operating without major incident, Pakistan's framework stands to become one of the more closely studied regulatory templates in South and Southeast Asian crypto policy.