XRP Treasury Firm Evernorth Bets on Native Lending Protocol That Has Yet to Clear Validator Vote
An XRP-focused treasury company is positioning itself to generate yield through DeFi, but its plans hinge on a lending protocol that still needs more than twice its current validator support to go live.
Evernorth Holdings, which together with affiliate Pathfinder Digital Assets held 473.1 million XRP as of December 31, 2025, has disclosed plans to deploy those holdings across lending facilities, liquidity pools, and options strategies on the XRP Ledger. The strategy depends in part on XLS-66, a proposed native lending protocol for the network that entered validator voting in January 2026 and currently sits at roughly 37 to 39 percent support. Direct lending activities specifically require XLS-66 activation, while AMM liquidity provision and options strategies do not. Activating any amendment on the XRP Ledger requires 80 percent of validators to agree across two consecutive weeks. As of August 20, that threshold remains far out of reach.
Ripple, the blockchain company closely associated with the XRP Ledger, formally cast its validator vote in favor of both XLS-65 (Single Asset Vault) and XLS-66 (Lending Protocol) on August 10. Ripple's vote counts as one among many cast by independent node operators and does not guarantee activation. The broader validator community still needs to come along. Security firm Halborn completed a re-audit of the lending protocol in June 2026 and found no critical or high-severity vulnerabilities. A separate Immunefi Attackathon, a structured competitive security review with a $200,000 prize pool, drew more than 60,000 security researchers and also contributed to the code review process.
Evernorth CEO Asheesh Birla framed the company's active approach as necessary given the scale of its position. "You have to have scale. Evernorth is the largest XRP treasury out there. You can't be passive," he said. The firm partnered with t54 Labs in January 2026 to handle automated lending, liquidity management, and risk controls. Planned yield strategies include providing liquidity to RLUSD/XRP trading pools, writing covered calls, and placing cash-secured puts, in addition to direct lending. Ripple's stablecoin RLUSD currently holds approximately 98 percent of stablecoin liquidity on the XRP Ledger and crossed a $1.6 billion market cap by mid-2026, with Q1 2026 transfer volume reaching a record $18.4 billion.
The company is also pursuing a Nasdaq listing through a SPAC merger with Armada Acquisition Corp II under the ticker XRPN, targeting more than $1 billion in gross proceeds. That process is ongoing and unresolved. As of early August, the amended S-4 registration statement filed on July 29 still listed blank shareholder meeting and record dates. Evernorth also disclosed a $233.7 million accounting impairment on its XRP holdings for 2025, reflecting the difference between an average acquisition cost of roughly $2.54 per token and prices that ranged between $1.45 and $2.09 at the time of filing. The impairment is a formal accounting recognition under applicable standards, not simply a paper loss tied to daily price movement. The origins of the company's holdings are also relevant context for evaluating its relationship with Ripple: Ripple contributed 126.8 million XRP directly to Pathfinder Digital Assets, and a further 211.3 million XRP came through a Series C subscription agreement, meaning a substantial portion of the combined holdings traces directly to Ripple. Additionally, Evernorth received a $135,000 bridge loan from Arrington XRP Capital, a relationship that has been identified as a potential conflict-of-interest signal in the context of the SPAC process.
The most consequential near-term application for XLS-66 may lie in global remittance infrastructure. Sub-Saharan Africa carries the highest average remittance fees in the world, at 8.78 percent, with six global corridors exceeding 20 percent. Ripple already counts Absa Bank in South Africa and pan-African mobile payments firm Chipper Cash among its active clients, and the company moved its Middle East and Africa regional headquarters to Dubai's DIFC in March 2025 under a full DFSA license. Ripple's UAE and Saudi Arabia remittance corridors alone cover roughly $79 billion in annual flows, with India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh as the primary receiving countries. Evernorth is not alone in targeting this infrastructure. Trident Digital, another XRP treasury operator, has earmarked a $500 million XRP treasury specifically for African corridor rollouts beginning mid-2026, signaling broader momentum around XRPL-based African liquidity. If XLS-66 reaches mainnet, African and South Asian payment companies could borrow RLUSD or XRP directly on-chain for working capital, bypassing correspondent banking networks and the fees they carry. The protocol is designed with permissioned vaults and off-chain credit underwriting specifically to meet institutional compliance requirements, which could make it usable for regulated entities in markets where fully open DeFi platforms remain off-limits. Birla, speaking about the company's decision to go public, characterized the current environment as favorable: "The timing couldn't be more perfect. We have the right kind of regulation, administration, and institutions ready to adopt."
The XRP Ledger's broader numbers provide useful context for the scale of what is being proposed. The network crossed 8 million activated accounts on July 16, 2026, and processes roughly 1.87 million transactions per day. Total value locked in XRPL's DeFi ecosystem currently sits at about $29.96 million, according to DefiLlama, a figure that reflects just how early the on-chain yield infrastructure remains. Tokenized real-world assets on XRPL have already surpassed $474 million in value, suggesting institutional appetite is building even before the lending protocol is live.
Whether Evernorth's plans translate into actual yield depends on two separate processes running in parallel: the XLS-66 amendment clearing a validator consensus vote that currently shows it less than halfway there, and a SPAC transaction that has not yet set a shareholder meeting date. Both timelines remain open.