VERSE PRESS

Crypto News, Global First.

Nigeria Formalizes Crypto Oversight With Multi-Agency Executive Order

President Tinubu's July directive forces the CBN, SEC, and tax authority to coordinate, ending years of regulatory overlap that pushed operators into gray areas.

|

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu signed the Presidential Executive Order on Virtual Assets Coordination, 2026 on July 17, taking immediate effect under Section 5 of Nigeria's 1999 Constitution (as amended). The order does not create a new regulator. Instead, it compels the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) to operate under a shared institutional framework for the first time. Nigeria processed $92.1 billion in crypto transactions between July 2024 and June 2025, ranking sixth globally and second on Chainalysis's grassroots adoption index. That volume represents a substantial increase from roughly $59 billion processed in the prior period (July 2023 to June 2024), when Nigeria ranked second globally. The rise in transaction volume alongside a drop in global rank reflects an increasingly competitive landscape as other markets have scaled rapidly. The order is a direct response to the jurisdictional gaps that unregistered operators have exploited in that high-volume environment.

The presidency was explicit about its intent. "The Order is designed to close these gaps through supervisory coordination, without introducing new layers of regulation or displacing the mandates of existing agencies," the Presidency of the Federal Republic of Nigeria stated in an official release issued via Bayo Onanuga, Special Adviser (Information and Strategy). The mechanism for that coordination is a new Virtual Asset Council chaired by the CBN, with the NRS and SEC serving as vice-chairs, and the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit and the Office of the National Security Adviser as members. A Virtual Asset Office (VAO), housed at the CBN, will serve as the council's operational secretariat, handling licensing applications, inter-agency data sharing, and regulatory reporting through an integrated supervisory technology platform.

The order draws a clear line between the two main regulators. The SEC takes jurisdiction over virtual assets classified as securities and over investment products. The CBN covers payments, settlement, custody, and non-security virtual asset services. Hybrid or ambiguous products will route through the VAO for a council determination. That split matters for builders: a payment wallet or custody app goes to the CBN, while a DeFi protocol structured to generate returns for holders likely falls under the SEC, according to practitioner analysis of the order. Agencies have 30 days from signing to produce a Harmonized Implementation Framework, and a broader Virtual Assets White Paper is in development. The CBN is also required to establish a regulatory sandbox where licensed blockchain projects can test products under supervised conditions before seeking full approval.

Tax treatment is also changing. The NRS is tasked with issuing crypto-specific guidance aimed at voluntary compliance and clearer revenue reporting. That guidance has not yet been published, but legal practitioners at Banwo and Ighodalo advise that platforms with significant Nigerian user bases should begin building transaction-reporting infrastructure now. In a separate but related move, SEC Circular No. 26-1, issued in January 2026, raised minimum capital requirements for licensed digital asset exchanges and custodians from 500 million naira to 2 billion naira (roughly $1.25 million at the exchange rate prevailing at the time of the circular). Platforms offering digital asset services at a lower tier face a 1 billion naira threshold; ancillary service providers are set at 300 million naira. The higher capital bar will likely consolidate the exchange market around well-funded domestic or internationally backed operators, while smaller Nigerian fintech startups may need to pivot to ancillary licensing to remain viable.

The order lands against a backdrop of regulatory turbulence that the Nigerian government is clearly trying to move past. The CBN banned commercial banks from facilitating crypto transactions in 2021, accelerating peer-to-peer adoption on platforms like Binance, Paxful, and local OTC desks. The ban was formally lifted in December 2023, at which point the SEC simultaneously assumed primary oversight authority over the sector. Then, in early 2024, Nigerian authorities detained Binance compliance executive Tigran Gambaryan on money laundering charges. Binance withdrew from the Nigerian market in March 2024, during that same detention period. Gambaryan was held from approximately February 2024 until October 2024, when he was released following sustained US diplomatic pressure and widespread concern over his deteriorating health. The episode damaged Nigeria's standing among international crypto businesses and underscored the cost of ad-hoc enforcement. The Investments and Securities Act of 2025, passed in March 2025, then gave the SEC statutory licensing authority over digital assets and explicitly classified digital assets as securities, settling a longstanding definitional dispute. The July 2026 executive order builds on that foundation by forcing coordination between the SEC and CBN rather than leaving them to compete over jurisdiction.

The stakes extend well beyond Nigeria's borders. Nigeria is the dominant peer-to-peer stablecoin corridor in West Africa, with roughly 22 million crypto users as of 2025 and projections reaching 28.7 million by end of 2026. Stablecoins (primarily USDT, USDC, and USDP) account for roughly 43 percent of Nigerian retail crypto volume, and monthly volumes spiked to $25 billion following the naira devaluation episode in early 2025. Stablecoin transfer fees on these corridors run at 2 to 3 percent, compared to 6 to 10 percent on legacy remittance channels. The IMF highlighted Nigeria's stablecoin penetration in a June 2026 analysis, framing the country as a test case for how frontier-market economies can regulate dollar-pegged digital assets during periods of currency instability. Regulatory clarity in Nigeria therefore has direct implications for remittance infrastructure across the ECOWAS zone. Within sub-Saharan Africa, Nigeria stands out as the most proactively coordinated major crypto jurisdiction, though South Africa retains the most operationally mature licensing infrastructure, with 248 FSCA-approved licenses in place. Kenya enacted a dual-regulator model in October 2025, Ghana has a framework in development, and Ethiopia maintains a largely prohibitive stance. Nigeria's new coordinated structure positions it to set the regulatory standard for the region.

The 30-day deadline for the Harmonized Implementation Framework means the first concrete enforcement signals will arrive by mid-August. For operators and developers serving Nigerian users, the window for ambiguity is closing.