---

The fee disclosure caps a months-long filing process and immediately reshuffles the competitive landscape. Bitwise's BHYP charges 0.34% (with a promotional zero-fee period on the first $500 million for one month), and 21Shares' THYP sits at 0.30%. Grayscale's 0.29% rate beats both on sticker price alone. VanEck has filed for its own US spot Hyperliquid ETF under ticker VHRL but has not yet disclosed fees. HYPG will trade on Nasdaq; BHYP lists on NYSE Arca and THYP already trades on Nasdaq alongside it.

Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart, commenting ahead of the fee disclosure, noted that Grayscale had yet to reveal the fee and that it was "a key detail investors continue to watch." The sixth amendment resolved that question. Seyffart had also described the fifth amendment, filed two days earlier, as looking like "nothing but a response to potential minor SEC comments or small clean-ups or formatting changes."

The broader fee context matters here. Bitcoin ETFs from BlackRock and Fidelity charge around 0.25%, and Grayscale's own Bitcoin Mini Trust has come down to 0.15%. The Hyperliquid products, launching at 0.29% to 0.34%, are slightly more expensive than the Bitcoin equivalents, which suggests further compression is likely as the market matures. Grayscale has its own history on this: its original Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) carried a 1.5% fee for years before competitive pressure forced a restructuring. The 0.29% figure signals a different posture from the start.

The fund's seed investor is Hyper Holdings Global LP, which committed roughly 2 million HYPE tokens. At prices recorded across various filing dates, that commitment was valued somewhere between $115 million and $130 million, with the variance reflecting HYPE's price movement during the filing period. The identity and ownership of Hyper Holdings Global LP have not been publicly disclosed. HYPG's custodian is Anchorage Digital Bank N.A., with CSC Delaware Trust Company serving as trustee.

One structural detail sets HYPG apart from most US crypto ETFs. If the SEC grants final approval for the staking component, HYPG would become only the second US crypto ETF to pass on-chain staking yields directly to shareholders, after Grayscale's own Ethereum staking ETF. That precedent makes the structure notable beyond a simple fee comparison. Shareholders would receive a proportional share of staking income accrued by the fund's HYPE holdings. Staking in this context means the fund's tokens participate in securing the Hyperliquid network and earn yield in return, similar to a dividend. Bitwise's BHYP and 21Shares' THYP (via staking provider Figment Inc.) both include staking features, making yield participation a standard expectation for the category, but the direct on-chain pass-through to shareholders remains structurally novel among US-listed products. Bitwise also pledged to direct 10% of all BHYP management fees toward purchasing HYPE for its own balance sheet, publishing on-chain wallet addresses to verify those purchases.

Hyperliquid is a Layer 1 blockchain built specifically for derivatives trading. Its perpetual futures exchange (a type of contract that lets traders speculate on asset prices without an expiry date) accounts for roughly 70% of all on-chain perpetual volume globally. The protocol has processed a cumulative $4.4 trillion in volume, generated over $1.265 billion in all-time fees, and currently buys back approximately $1.9 million worth of HYPE tokens per day from the open market. As of June 1, HYPE trades around $73.39, near its all-time high of $74.18, with a market capitalization of roughly $17.46 billion. The project raised no venture capital and distributed 31% of its token supply directly to users via airdrop.

For investors outside the United States, the picture is more complicated. HYPG, BHYP, and THYP are US-listed products and are not directly accessible to retail investors in markets like India, Nigeria, Kenya, or Pakistan without a brokerage that offers US market access. That kind of access is available to some higher-income investors through platforms like Interactive Brokers, Zerodha International for South Asian investors, and Standard Bank's global equities desk for South African investors, but it remains out of reach for most retail participants in those regions.

Despite that barrier, the ETF wave still carries indirect relevance. HYPE trades on centralized exchanges including KuCoin, MEXC, and Gate.io in INR, NGN, and PKR pairs, meaning institutional inflows into US-listed products affect the token price that local traders are already exposed to. In high-inflation economies such as Nigeria, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka, the staking yield component carries particular significance. Yield-bearing assets address a practical need that local currency savings often cannot meet, making the outcome of the staking approval question relevant well beyond the US context.

India presents a more specific regulatory pathway. SEBI has shown openness to international ETF-of-ETF structures, and a maturing US HYPE ETF market could eventually become eligible for Indian mutual fund wrap products, offering retail investors on platforms such as CoinDCX, WazirX, and ZebPay an indirect regulated route to HYPE exposure.

South Africa is a separate case. The FSCA now regulates crypto as a financial product, and the emergence of regulated HYPE ETFs in both the US and Europe (VanEck runs a Hyperliquid ETN on Deutsche Börse Xetra at a 1.50% fee) could eventually encourage domestic product proposals for South African exchanges.

With Nasdaq approval secured and the sixth amendment now on file, the primary remaining variable is the SEC's sign-off on HYPG's staking feature. The two existing products, BHYP and THYP, together held roughly $118.97 million in AUM in late May 2026. Grayscale's seed commitment alone approaches that figure. Whether the fee advantage translates into sustained inflows will depend on launch timing and staking yield approval. More broadly, the pace at which VanEck's VHRL advances through the regulatory queue will shape overall category dynamics and the competitive intensity of a market that, as recently as early 2026, did not exist at all.