NYSE Parent ICE Held Talks With Hyperliquid While Lobbying Regulators Against It, CEO Confirms
The Intercontinental Exchange evaluated a possible engagement with the decentralized derivatives platform even as it pressed U.S. regulators to scrutinize the same company.
Jeff Sprecher, CEO of the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), confirmed publicly on May 27 that his firm held multiple conversations with Hyperliquid to study the onchain perpetuals platform's market model. ICE is the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange. Sprecher made the disclosure at the Bernstein Annual Strategic Decision Conference, two days before The Block first reported the full extent of his remarks. The admission is notable because ICE had, just weeks earlier, joined CME Group in privately briefing CFTC officials and Capitol Hill lawmakers about what the two incumbent exchanges described as manipulation and sanctions evasion risks posed by Hyperliquid.
Speaking at the Bernstein conference, Sprecher was openly complimentary. "Hyperliquid[,] if you haven't heard of it yet[,] it's bigger than Nasdaq, okay? Eleven people. When you see this, you'll say, wow, that's incredible," he said.
He added: "I love this. I wish I were younger so I could jump in and do it myself." On the nature of the discussions, Sprecher described a mutual learning process: "We are engaging with these people, understanding what they are doing. They are learning about our world, and we are learning about theirs."
The dual posture is difficult to ignore. In mid-May 2026, Bloomberg reported that both CME and ICE had jointly warned federal officials that Hyperliquid's anonymous, around-the-clock structure created market manipulation and sanctions evasion risks. ICE controls the Brent crude benchmark. At the same time, ICE announced a partnership with crypto exchange OKX to launch perpetual oil futures built on ICE's own Brent and WTI price indexes, products that compete directly with markets built through Hyperliquid's HIP-3 upgrade, which enables synthetic trading in commodities and equities. ICE also holds a minority stake in OKX valued at roughly $200 million. The competitive move, the regulatory lobbying, and the admiring conference remarks all occurred within roughly the same two-week window.
ICE's engagement with Hyperliquid fits a broader pattern of expensive crypto bets. The company previously launched Bakkt, a regulated crypto custody and futures venture that struggled to gain traction, and in March 2026 it committed more than $600 million to Polymarket, the global prediction market platform. That investment is particularly striking alongside ICE's simultaneous lobbying posture: Polymarket, like Hyperliquid, operates as a permissionless venue open to users worldwide.
The catalyst that brought Hyperliquid to broad institutional attention came in late February and early March 2026, when U.S. and Israeli strikes against Iran triggered a weekend geopolitical shock. Because CME and ICE markets were closed for the weekend, traders who needed immediate oil price exposure turned in large numbers to platforms like Hyperliquid, which runs continuously. Daily volume on Hyperliquid's oil contracts surged roughly 250 times from negligible prior levels, peaking near $1.7 billion per day. Cumulative volume in those contracts crossed $7.3 billion by March 12.
Mary-Catherine Lader, CEO of Native Markets, told Fortune around that episode: "So, 24/7 global events are creating demand for 24/7 markets. There's been plenty of enthusiasm about blockchain enabling 24/7 markets for years, but now there's real market demand."
Hyperliquid's growth helps explain why ICE is paying attention. The platform processed approximately $619 billion in perpetuals volume during the first quarter of 2026 and commands an estimated 70 percent of all onchain perpetual trading. As of May 29, its 30-day perp volume stood at $188.1 billion, with $9.54 billion in open interest and $5.53 billion in total value locked. The platform generates annualized fees of approximately $748 million on a team Sprecher himself put at 11 people. HYPE, the platform's native token, reached an all-time high of $64.63 on May 26 and was trading around $61.25 at time of publication, giving it a market cap near $13.6 billion and a ranking of 11th on CoinGecko.
For users outside the United States and other restricted jurisdictions, the regulatory stakes of this story are concrete. Hyperliquid operates across approximately 190 countries with no KYC requirements, making it one of the few venues where traders in markets like Nigeria, Kenya, India, and Pakistan can access dollar-denominated exposure to crude oil perpetual contracts and equity synthetics without navigating the documentation barriers and licensing restrictions that typically gate CME or ICE products. South Africa represents a further case in point: African traders face disproportionate friction on traditional derivatives exchanges, and the availability of stablecoins such as USDC and USDT as dollar proxies has made permissionless perpetual trading a practical pathway for many on the continent.
Nigeria is a major crude oil producer; India is among the world's largest oil importers. Both countries have active retail crypto user bases and face capital controls, limited brokerage infrastructure, and exchange licensing barriers that restrict access to regulated Western derivatives exchanges.
Any regulatory outcome that forces Hyperliquid to implement geo-blocking or identity verification would fall hardest on these users, who rely on permissionless infrastructure precisely because they cannot access the incumbents. Hyperliquid's own policy arm has signaled willingness to engage: "We look forward to continuing to work with policymakers in Washington to integrate onchain markets into the regulatory framework," the Hyperliquid Policy Center said in response to the ICE and CME lobbying reports.
Whether ICE's talks with Hyperliquid eventually produce a formal partnership, an acquisition attempt, or simply competitive intelligence remains unclear. What is clear is that one of the largest exchange infrastructure companies in the United States has studied Hyperliquid closely enough to praise it publicly at an investor conference, while simultaneously pressing federal regulators to constrain it.
The outcome of that contradiction will shape not only the onchain derivatives market but also the over 1.4 million traders globally who have already voted with their volume.