VERSE PRESS

Crypto News, Global First.

JPMorgan Sees Institutional Retreat from Bitcoin and Gold as Iran Deal Optimism Builds

Both crypto and precious metal ETFs are bleeding capital simultaneously, and a bank strategist says the same geopolitical logic explains both.

|

JPMorgan strategist Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou published a research note on May 28, 2026 arguing that concurrent outflows from bitcoin and gold exchange-traded funds signal a broad unwinding of the so-called debasement trade. The retreat, he contends, is being driven by improving expectations around a potential Iran-US diplomatic agreement rather than any simple reallocation between the two asset classes.

The debasement trade refers to the strategy of buying assets with fixed or capped supply, principally gold and bitcoin, as protection against governments eroding the purchasing power of fiat currencies through deficit spending and monetary expansion. The thesis gained significant traction from 2024 through early 2026 as US fiscal deficits widened and inflation remained elevated, with US CPI running at 3.8 percent annualized as of March 2026, partly driven by energy costs. When Iran-Iraq hostilities escalated in late February 2026, energy supply fears and geopolitical uncertainty produced a complex and uneven picture across asset classes: bitcoin ETFs such as BlackRock's IBIT recorded modest inflows of approximately 1.5 percent, while gold ETFs registered $12 billion in outflows during March 2026, even as direct gold accumulation continued alongside those ETF redemptions. Now, as diplomatic signals improve, that institutional positioning appears to be reversing course.

Notably, US bitcoin ETFs had recorded three consecutive months of net inflows heading into May 2026, a streak widely cited as evidence of growing institutional conviction in the asset class. That context sharpens the significance of the current reversal. It also represents a shift in JPMorgan's own analytical position: the bank published an earlier 2026 note arguing that bitcoin was "gaining on gold" in the debasement trade. The current research note walks back that thesis in light of the evolving geopolitical picture.

"These outflows appear to be more consistent with a broad retreat by investors from the debasement trade, potentially in anticipation of an Iran-US deal, rather than with a rotation from bitcoin to gold," Panigirtzoglou wrote in the note.

The Numbers

The scale of the pullback is significant. US spot bitcoin ETFs recorded a six-day outflow streak between May 6 and May 17, shedding a combined $1.55 billion. The week of May 11 through 17 alone saw $1.26 billion exit, the largest weekly outflow since January 2026. A single day, May 13, saw $635 million in redemptions. BlackRock's IBIT and Fidelity's FBTC, the two largest US spot bitcoin products, recorded single-day outflows of $68.9 million and $36.3 million respectively on a Friday. For context, BlackRock's IBIT alone attracted more than $25 billion in net inflows over the full calendar year 2025, meaning the current outflows, while notable in pace, remain modest relative to the product's established asset base. Year-to-date net inflows into US bitcoin ETFs now stand at approximately $536 million as of May 25, a steep pullback from the $2.44 billion that flowed in during April alone.

Gold ETFs tell a parallel story. Global gold ETF holdings fell by 19 tonnes in May, bringing total holdings to 3,541 tonnes across a $374 billion asset base. North American gold ETFs accounted for $1.5 billion of the $1.8 billion in total global outflows for the month. Asian gold ETFs recorded an additional $489 million in outflows over the same period. European funds provided a partial offset with $225 million in inflows, but they could not absorb the broader trend.

Bitcoin itself moved from a range of roughly $82,000 to $83,000 in early May down to the $75,000 to $77,000 zone by late May, with Intellectia.ai citing $73,000 to $75,000 as the next key technical support band. Ethereum ETFs also suffered, recording 10 consecutive days of outflows totalling approximately $216 million in their worst week.

The Geopolitical Trigger

The Iran-Iraq conflict that escalated in late February 2026 was the catalyst that most recently accelerated both the debasement trade and bitcoin's specific entanglement with geopolitics.

By March 2026, Iran had begun accepting bitcoin and stablecoins as payment for Strait of Hormuz transit fees, at roughly $1 per barrel, potentially generating around $2 million per vessel passage. That development deepened the narrative of bitcoin as a geopolitical asset. Iran's domestic crypto economy, estimated at $7.7 to $7.8 billion in annual transaction volume, has further entrenched digital assets in the country's financial infrastructure. If a deal materialises and sanctions begin lifting, the future of that shadow crypto economy becomes an open question, adding a layer of complexity to any diplomatic settlement.

Now, with US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner in negotiations alongside Pakistani intermediaries serving as diplomatic go-betweens, sentiment has shifted. A deal that eases Strait of Hormuz tensions would reduce energy supply fears, lower inflation pressure, and undercut the central logic of the debasement hedge. However, as of May 28, no formal agreement exists. Prediction market platform Polymarket placed the probability of a finalized deal at approximately 37 percent following President Trump's announcement of advanced talks, meaning roughly two-thirds odds remain that negotiations could stall.

A Tale of Two Adoption Stories

The institutional pullback visible in ETF data does not map cleanly onto crypto users in South Asia or sub-Saharan Africa. These regions hold some of the world's highest grassroots adoption rates, and their reasons for holding bitcoin and stablecoins are anchored in domestic conditions rather than global macro positioning.

India leads the 2026 Global Crypto Adoption Index with a near-perfect score, with combined users across WazirX and CoinDCX reaching approximately 60 million. South Asia recorded an 80 percent year-over-year increase in crypto transaction volume between 2024 and 2025, reaching $2.36 trillion in total on-chain value. Pakistani users, numbering over 9 million, have also deepened their reliance on crypto for cross-border remittances, with Binance P2P reporting 18.7 percent growth in Pakistan remittance flows. Pakistan's role in the current geopolitical moment extends beyond adoption figures: it is serving as a diplomatic intermediary in the US-Iran negotiations, making it the only country in this story that sits simultaneously at the intersection of the diplomatic track and the grassroots crypto narrative. None of these users hold positions through ETFs, and none of their underlying reasons for holding crypto, namely rupee depreciation and remittance costs, improve because US-Iran relations are warming.

In sub-Saharan Africa, where on-chain value received surpassed $205 billion between mid-2024 and mid-2025, bitcoin functions primarily as a currency hedge against naira weakness in Nigeria and similar pressures elsewhere. Four sub-Saharan African countries now appear in the global top-20 adoption index, up from two in 2024, reflecting structural rather than speculative growth in the region. Seventy-four percent of Nigerian crypto holders are under 30. For these users, institutional outflow figures are largely a foreign benchmark, except through one very real channel: price. If continued ETF redemptions push bitcoin lower, retail holders in Lagos or Karachi absorb losses tied to decisions made in New York and London.

What Comes Next

The direction of both the Iran negotiations and the debasement trade may hinge on the same set of variables. If talks break down and geopolitical tension returns, the macro case for supply-capped assets reasserts itself quickly. April's $2.44 billion inflow into bitcoin ETFs shows institutional appetite can return fast. For now, JPMorgan's framing suggests Western allocators are treating de-escalation as the base case, even as prediction markets remain far from certain. Whether that bet holds depends on diplomacy, not on-chain fundamentals. The stakes of that diplomatic outcome, however, are not felt equally. For an institutional desk in New York, a stalled Iran deal is a portfolio thesis to revisit. For a remittance sender in Karachi or a young saver in Lagos, the same outcome shapes whether the asset in their pocket gains or loses value this week.