VERSE PRESS

Crypto News, Global First.

Fenwick & West Agrees to $54M Settlement Over FTX Legal Work, But International Victims Still Face Recovery Gap

Silicon Valley law firm Fenwick & West has agreed to pay $54 million to settle claims that its legal work helped enable the FTX fraud, marking the largest professional-services settlement to emerge from the exchange's 2022 collapse.

|

The agreement was filed May 22 in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It remains preliminary and requires judicial approval. Fenwick served as FTX's lead outside counsel as the exchange grew into one of the world's largest crypto platforms before filing for bankruptcy on November 11, 2022. The firm admits no wrongdoing and says it "was not aware of the fraud at FTX, stands by the integrity of its legal work, and disputes wrongdoing of any kind."

Plaintiffs allege Fenwick did far more than routine legal work. According to court filings cited by Reuters, the firm "helped to craft and implement strategies that facilitated FTX's fraud," including constructing what the complaint describes as "shadowy entities" designed to help FTX evade regulatory scrutiny and allow customer funds to be commingled with those of Alameda Research, the affiliated trading firm at the center of the fraud. The case was originally filed in late 2023. Fenwick sought to have the case dismissed, but a federal judge rejected that motion in November 2025, clearing the path for settlement talks that concluded approximately two and a half years after the original filing. The $54 million figure had previously been kept under seal; its disclosure in the May 22 filing marks the first time the amount has been made public.

Where the $54M Fits in the Broader Recovery Picture

FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried was convicted of fraud in 2023 and sentenced to 25 years in prison in March 2024. Since then, the FTX estate has recovered more than $15 billion in assets, including equity stakes in Anthropic and Robinhood. Creditor distributions have moved in three completed rounds: $454 million in February 2025, $5 billion in May 2025, and $1.6 billion in September 2025, bringing total confirmed payments to over $7 billion. A fourth distribution of approximately $2.2 billion was announced for March 2026 but had not been confirmed as paid at the time of publication.

The $54 million from Fenwick is a comparatively small addition to that pool, but its significance is symbolic as much as financial. It is the largest settlement reached with any professional service provider in the FTX litigation. FTX's auditor, Prager Metis CPAs, settled SEC negligence charges in 2024 for $1.95 million and reached a separate private settlement with victims in October 2025 at an undisclosed amount. A lawsuit against law firm Sullivan and Cromwell was abandoned, with court filings citing insufficient evidence.

A separate federal lawsuit against Fenwick, filed by 20 plaintiffs in Washington D.C., is still active and seeks $525 million. That case names individual Fenwick partners, not just the firm, representing a further escalation of professional accountability claims.

International Users Are Recovering Less

Recovery rates vary significantly by creditor class, and the gap has particular consequences for users outside the United States. Holders of smaller claims below $50,000 are projected to recover roughly 120% of their claim value. US customers overall are tracking toward approximately 95% recovery. International customers, classified under the "dotcom" category in the bankruptcy, are projected to recover around 78%.

That 17-percentage-point gap matters most for users in Africa and South Asia, where FTX's reach was substantial and the financial stakes were often proportionally larger. Africa had approximately 53 million crypto users as of mid-2022, representing about 16.5% of global crypto users at the time. Nigeria alone counted more than 22 million users and ranked 11th on Chainalysis's 2022 Global Crypto Adoption Index. Many of those users were not speculative traders. They used FTX to dollarise savings, taking advantage of the 8% annual yield on stablecoins, or for cross-border remittances, functions closer to basic banking than to investment.

Nigerian crypto studio Nestcoin lost $4 million in operating capital held on FTX and laid off roughly 30 staff members. Six platforms in Nigeria were directly affected by the collapse, and more than 15 additional platforms across the rest of Africa were also significantly affected, bringing the continent-wide total to more than 21 platforms directly or seriously impacted. Luno cut 35% of its global workforce; Chipper Cash laid off a third of its staff; and Paxful suspended operations entirely. The regulatory fallout extended beyond corporate casualties: Rwanda's National Bank banned financial service providers from engaging in crypto activities following the collapse, and LocalBitcoins exited the Rwandan market.

In India, the FTX collapse hit an already stressed market. The country had introduced a 30% crypto tax earlier in 2022, and the exchange's failure sent trading volumes at WazirX, Bitbns, and Zebpay down 14%, 32%, and 40% respectively in a single day. BIS data covering Brazil, India, Pakistan, Thailand, and Turkey found that median investor losses in those markets reached $431, against an average investment of approximately $900. Pakistan and Bangladesh faced particular strain as well: both countries had developed significant crypto exposure through remittance use cases, and both faced heightened regulatory pressure in the aftermath of the collapse.

What Comes Next

The Fenwick settlement, once approved, will add to the recovery pool available to all creditors, including international ones. But the more consequential number to watch may be the $525 million D.C. lawsuit, which targets individual partners and has not settled. Regulators in the Global South are also drawing their own conclusions. India's SEBI, Nigeria's SEC, and South Africa's FSCA have all moved toward stricter crypto registration requirements since 2022. Proponents of local custody requirements argue that settlements like this one reinforce the legal logic behind those moves: if professional-services firms can be held liable under US court jurisdiction for work that affected users worldwide, the case for requiring local custody and local regulatory accountability only grows stronger.

For creditors still waiting on distributions, the next scheduled payment and any approval ruling on the Fenwick settlement are the immediate milestones to track.