---

Petro identified Barranquilla, Santa Marta, and Riohacha as potential locations for mining infrastructure, framing the initiative as an economic development tool for historically marginalized areas. "It's an immense boost to the development of the Caribbean," he said in public remarks. The proposal calls for the Wayúu people, Colombia's largest Indigenous community and longtime residents of the La Guajira peninsula, to hold a co-ownership stake in any resulting operations. Petro has previously argued that directing energy surpluses toward cryptocurrency mining could reduce reliance on illicit economies in marginalized areas.

Petro's interest in Bitcoin is not new. As a senator, he publicly advocated for renewable-powered Bitcoin mining as an alternative to the cocaine trade, and in May 2025 he confirmed personal Bitcoin holdings, making him one of a very small number of sitting heads of state to openly hold the asset. That history suggests the Caribbean coast proposal reflects a considered, long-standing position rather than an improvised announcement.

The energy case for the Caribbean coast is real. Colombia generates roughly 75 percent of its electricity from renewable sources, more than double the global average, according to a World Bank report from April 2024. The Caribbean coastal region holds an estimated 21 gigawatts of onshore wind capacity, and La Guajira alone holds approximately 50 gigawatts of offshore wind potential, with solar irradiance reaching 6 kilowatt-hours per square meter per day. The Colombian government has already committed $1.7 billion in grid investment for the Caribbean region under its "Connected Caribbean" program. Despite this, total installed renewable capacity nationwide sits at about 4.2 gigawatts against a national target of 6 gigawatts, meaning the infrastructure to deliver that potential at scale is still incomplete.

Paraguay, the primary comparison Petro invoked, offers a concrete benchmark. The landlocked nation leverages surplus hydroelectric output from the Itaipú Dam and now accounts for roughly 4.3 percent of the global Bitcoin network's computing power, or about 43 exahashes per second (a measure of mining activity). Industrial electricity there runs at $0.04 to $0.05 per kilowatt-hour. By contrast, Colombia's average industrial electricity rate sits near $0.15 per kilowatt-hour, according to industry data, well above the break-even threshold of $0.07 to $0.08 per kilowatt-hour for competitive mining operations identified in the Spark/CoinShares Q1 2026 report. Closing that gap would require either dedicated low-cost renewable supply agreements or purpose-built off-grid facilities. One Colombian operation has already demonstrated this is achievable on a small scale: Horeb Energy, working with environmental services firm Veolia, mines Bitcoin in Norte de Santander using landfill biogas at $0.025 per kilowatt-hour, making it one of the lowest-cost operations documented in the hemisphere. That project remains a single facility, not a national template.

Venezuela, the second reference model Petro named, presents a considerably more complicated picture. Despite substantial stranded-gas energy resources, Venezuela currently accounts for approximately 0.6 percent of the global Bitcoin network's computing power, or roughly 5 exahashes per second. Infrastructure decay, OFAC sanctions, and years of political instability under the Maduro government held actual mining output far below the country's theoretical energy potential. The Maduro government was deposed in January 2026, and the new administration is reported to hold an unconfirmed Bitcoin reserve. U.S. licensing under OFAC General License 48A has since opened limited pathways for American operators, but Venezuela's trajectory illustrates clearly that energy abundance alone does not produce a functioning mining sector.

The Wayúu co-ownership proposal carries political weight but also significant complications. In 2023, Italian energy company Enel permanently halted construction of its Windpeshi wind farm in La Guajira after sustained community protests over inadequate consultation, insufficient compensation, and concerns about cultural disruption. The conflict illustrated that energy development in the region, regardless of its environmental credentials, is deeply contested. A co-ownership framework could distinguish a mining initiative from previous projects, but only if it is backed by enforceable legal agreements and a genuine free, prior, and informed consent process. Neither currently exists in Colombian mining law, which has no dedicated legislation for Bitcoin or cryptocurrency mining operations.

The political timeline is the most immediate constraint. Colombia's presidential election falls on May 31, 2026. Petro is constitutionally prohibited from seeking a second term, and neither of the leading candidates, Senator Iván Cepeda and lawyer Abelardo de la Espriella, has stated a public position on digital assets policy. Any regulatory or institutional framework Petro's administration establishes before August would carry uncertain weight under an incoming government with no declared commitment to the initiative.

Colombia's broader crypto environment provides useful context for assessing where a mining initiative would land. The country recorded $44.2 billion in on-chain transaction volume between July 2024 and June 2025, ranking it fifth in Latin America by volume. It also introduced mandatory crypto reporting under Resolution 000240, effective December 24, 2025, with first filings due in May 2027 and alignment to the OECD's Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework. That existing activity and regulatory infrastructure means any mining program would enter a market with meaningful foundations rather than starting from scratch.

For readers tracking similar dynamics in South Asia and Africa, the Colombian situation is instructive. Pakistan has explored state-directed Bitcoin mining using surplus electricity from water and power projects. Ethiopia has signed direct agreements with industrial miners drawing on hydropower from the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. Colombia's attempt, if it advances, would add to a growing record of how governments try to convert underutilized clean energy into mining revenue while managing community rights and regulatory continuity. The common thread across all these cases is that resource potential alone rarely determines outcomes: the variables that matter most are grid access, political durability, and community consent.

Bitcoin's global network is currently processing roughly 1,004 exahashes per second (Q2 2026). Any Colombian operation starting from zero would contribute a modest share for years before reaching the scale Paraguay has built. Whether the Caribbean coast becomes a meaningful point on that map will depend less on the strength of the wind and more on what, if anything, survives the August transition.

---

Sources: CoinTelegraph, Hashrate Index Latin America Report 2026, PV-Tech, Stockholm Environment Institute, Bitcoin Magazine, World Bank (April 2024), Dialogue Earth, Americas Quarterly, Spark/CoinShares Q1 2026.