Rep. Begich to Reintroduce Bitcoin Reserve Bill, Seeking Permanent Law Where Executive Order Falls Short
Rep. Nick Begich (R-AK) announced this week that he plans to reintroduce a U.S. Bitcoin strategic reserve bill under a new name within the coming weeks, aiming to convert President Trump's March 2025 executive order into durable federal statute. The move comes after more than a year of the original legislation stalling in committee and the executive order failing to trigger any new Bitcoin purchases.
The original bill, the Boosting Innovation, Technology, and Competitiveness through Optimized Investment Nationwide Act of 2025 (BITCOIN Act, H.R. 2032), was introduced by Begich and Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) on March 11, 2025. It called on the Treasury to acquire 1 million Bitcoin over five years, at roughly 200,000 BTC per year, funded through Federal Reserve remittances and gold certificate revaluation. The Senate companion (S. 954) was referred to the Senate Banking Committee, where it has remained without a vote. The specific title of the upcoming bill has not been released publicly.
Why Legislation Matters More Than the Executive Order
Trump signed an executive order on March 6, 2025, directing the government to hold its seized Bitcoin as a reserve rather than sell it, and creating a separate stockpile for other digital assets. David Sacks, the White House AI and Crypto Czar, publicly announced the signing and framed it as a foundational step toward formalizing the federal government's posture on digital assets. But the order contained a significant acknowledgment: it would require congressional action to be fully operational. Trump crypto adviser Patrick Witt described the challenge at the time as presenting "novel legal questions," as the Treasury lacks clear legal authority to create specialized Bitcoin custody accounts without a statute authorizing them.
The practical result is a reserve that exists on paper but has not grown by a single satoshi through intentional acquisition. As of February 2026, the U.S. government holds approximately 328,372 BTC, valued at roughly $25 billion, all accumulated through criminal and civil asset forfeiture proceedings rather than open-market purchases. An executive order can be reversed by any successor president on their first day in office; a statute cannot.
"The legislation ensures that the U.S. formally adopts Bitcoin as a strategic asset, reinforcing our economic independence," Begich said when introducing the original bill. Sen. Lummis described the effort as transforming "the president's visionary executive action into enduring law."
Based on Begich's stated framing and a comparison with related House measure H.R. 2112, Verse Press analysis assesses that the rebranded bill appears likely to focus on codifying the existing holdings and forfeiture framework rather than mandating a large-scale acquisition program. That narrower scope may face less fiscal opposition in committee than the original bill's purchase mandate, which would require acquiring 1 million BTC at an estimated cost of approximately $80 to $100 billion based on prices at the time of the bill's introduction.
Legislative Pathways and Competing Bills
According to reporting from CoinDesk and others, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), typically passed each December, is the most realistic vehicle for attaching reserve language in 2026, given the standalone bill's slow progress. A separate House measure, the Bitcoin for America Act (H.R. 6180), introduced by Rep. Warren Davidson (R-OH) in November 2025, offers an alternative approach: directing Americans to pay federal taxes in Bitcoin, with those payments flowing into the reserve. That model builds the reserve through market demand rather than a top-down purchase mandate.
At the state level, Texas, New Hampshire, Arizona, and Missouri have each advanced their own Bitcoin reserve legislation, applying bottom-up pressure on Congress to formalize a federal position. New Hampshire moved furthest fastest, passing a bill in early 2025 that made it the first U.S. state to formally authorize Bitcoin holdings.
Market Context
Bitcoin is trading near $77,875 as of late April 2026, up approximately 13.6% on the month and on pace for its strongest monthly performance in over a year. The asset crossed $75,000 for the first time on April 21. Network hash rate stands at 750 exahashes per second, up 12% month over month. On-chain metrics show the MVRV ratio (Market Value to Realized Value, which measures how far the current price sits above the average acquisition cost across all holders) at 2.8, and the SOPR (Spent Output Profit Ratio, which indicates whether coins being moved on a given day are, on average, changing hands at a gain or a loss) at 1.15.
Regional Stakes: South Asia and Africa
For countries outside the United States, the difference between an executive order and a law is not a procedural footnote. It is a signal about whether Bitcoin qualifies as a permanent sovereign asset or a policy experiment that could be unwound.
Pakistan announced its own strategic Bitcoin reserve in May 2025, citing the U.S. move as a model, and allocated 2,000 megawatts of electricity in Phase 1 for Bitcoin mining and AI infrastructure. The country's Crypto Council is developing a FATF-compliant regulatory authority called the Pakistan Digital Assets Authority (PDAA), led by Bilal Bin Saqib, though that framework has not yet been fully enacted. A codified U.S. reserve would reinforce Pakistan's political rationale for those commitments.
In India, where a 30% flat tax on crypto gains and a 1% TDS (Tax Deducted at Source) regime have pushed trading volumes offshore since 2022, a permanent U.S. reserve could give policymakers political cover to reframe Bitcoin as a reserve-grade asset rather than a speculative instrument. Indian observers are closely watching both the U.S. legislative calendar and Pakistan's trajectory. For Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh alike, U.S. legislative codification carries weight: each country has emerging crypto frameworks whose political durability depends partly on whether sovereign Bitcoin adoption is treated as a serious international norm or a reversible American experiment.
Across Sub-Saharan Africa, on-chain transaction value exceeded $205 billion in the year ending June 2025, a 52% increase year over year. Nigeria, Kenya, Ethiopia, and South Africa all ranked in the top 20 of the 2026 Global Crypto Adoption Index. Nigeria, Africa's largest crypto market, gained new institutional momentum in 2025 when the Central Bank of Nigeria reversed its longstanding restrictions, lifting the prohibition on banks working with licensed crypto providers and opening a formal channel for crypto integration across the country's financial system. Kenya enacted its Virtual Asset Service Providers Act in November 2025 and is hosting Adopting Bitcoin Nairobi in June 2026, the first large-scale edition of the globally recognized conference series to take place in East Africa. South Africa is actively evaluating Bitcoin's potential role in national reserves as a hedge against rand volatility.
The geopolitical context extends beyond these regions. El Salvador, the first country to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender, has maintained a sovereign BTC reserve since 2021, establishing an early template that Pakistan and several African nations have since referenced in their own policy deliberations. A U.S. statute would add institutional weight to that precedent.
For communities across both regions that rely on Bitcoin and stablecoin rails for remittances, U.S. legislative legitimization of Bitcoin as a state reserve asset supports the regulatory narrative that allows local banks and fintechs to integrate crypto infrastructure without fear of policy reversal. A CoinDesk opinion piece noted that crypto-based remittance corridors can reduce transfer costs from 6.4% to under 1%, a meaningful difference in economies such as Nigeria and Kenya, where remittance inflows represent a critical source of household income.
What Comes Next
Begich has not specified an exact introduction date, saying only that he plans to reintroduce the bill within the next few weeks. The bill's title remains unconfirmed. The NDAA timeline, with markup typically beginning in mid-year, creates a practical deadline if reserve advocates want to attach language to must-pass legislation in 2026. Whether the new bill retains the original's 1 million BTC acquisition target or scales back to formalizing the existing forfeiture-based holdings will determine how much fiscal resistance it faces in committee.
Verse Press will update this article when the bill text is formally introduced.