---

Senators Angela Alsobrooks (Democrat, Maryland) and Thom Tillis (Republican, North Carolina) have brokered a framework agreement on stablecoin rewards as part of the CLARITY Act, the US Senate's pending crypto market structure legislation. The deal, reported April 22, would prohibit stablecoin issuers from paying returns based purely on a user holding tokens, while explicitly permitting rewards tied to specific actions such as using a wallet, participating in a protocol, joining loyalty programs, providing liquidity, or staking. The question of whether that distinction holds up under lobbying pressure and a looming ethics fight will likely determine whether the bill reaches a Senate floor vote before midterm election season closes the window.

What the Compromise Actually Does

The CLARITY Act builds on the GENIUS Act, which was signed into law on July 18, 2025, after the Senate voted 68 to 30 on June 17 and the House voted 308 to 122 on July 17. That earlier legislation established a federal framework for payment stablecoins, requiring full reserve backing in US dollars or short-term Treasuries and banning issuers from offering interest simply for holding tokens. The CLARITY Act reopens that question by carving out space for non-issuer entities, including exchanges, wallets, and DeFi protocols, to pay activity-based rewards.

A key Senate negotiator, identified in prior reporting as Tillis, told reporters as recently as March: "We think we've got it." Senate negotiators have more recently been described in reporting by The Block as characterizing the talks as being in a "good spot," though The Block's primary reporting on this point was behind a paywall and could not be independently verified.

Banks Sound the Alarm

The American Bankers Association's Community Bankers Council has characterized the activity-based carve-out as a dangerous workaround. In a statement, the group warned: "If billions are displaced from community bank lending, small businesses, farmers, students, and home buyers in towns like ours will suffer." Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island introduced separate legislation in February specifically to close what he called an "alarming loophole" in the GENIUS Act's yield prohibition.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency entered the fray in February with a 376-page regulatory proposal aimed at restricting third-party yield arrangements. Analysts have read the proposal as reflecting serious concern about structural risk to the deposit base, though the administration's precise motivations remain a matter of interpretation.

The Trump Problem

Separate from the yield debate, the bill faces a politically charged obstacle in the form of the president's own crypto holdings. Trump's family has collected approximately 75 percent of net proceeds from token sales by World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the crypto firm co-founded by Eric Trump. By December 2025, the Trump family had received approximately $1 billion in WLFI token sale profits. CNBC reported a Bloomberg estimate placing the president's total crypto-related profits at roughly $620 million as of mid-2025, with unsold WLFI token holdings valued at around $3 billion. The two figures are not directly comparable: the $620 million represents an estimate of total crypto profits through mid-2025, while the $1 billion reflects WLFI token sale proceeds specifically through December 2025.

WLFI's USD1 stablecoin has grown rapidly, reaching a market cap of approximately $4.5 to $4.7 billion by the end of Q1 2026, up roughly 50 percent from the prior quarter. Its largest single settlement was a $2 billion transaction in the MGX-Binance deal. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Jeff Merkley sent a letter to both MGX and Binance asking why the parties chose "a newly-launched, untested cryptocurrency with no track record" for that transaction. The senators framed the question around what they described as "the obvious benefit of gaining favor, directly or indirectly, with the Trump Administration."

The Trump administration has been blunt about its position on any legislative attempt to address those conflicts. A White House adviser stated in February, in remarks reported by CoinDesk, that the administration would not allow the crypto bill to attack the president on ethics. Eric Trump, for his part, called US banks "anti-American" for opposing stablecoin yield in March.

What This Means Beyond US Borders

The stablecoin yield debate has direct consequences for users in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, where stablecoins have become a practical tool for cross-border remittances. The global average remittance fee stood at 6.49 percent per transaction as of 2025, according to World Bank and McKinsey data. Average fees in sub-Saharan Africa run even higher, at 8.78 percent per transaction, well above both the global baseline and the UN's 3 percent target. India and Pakistan ranked among the top five countries globally for crypto adoption between January and July 2025, driven partly by stablecoin-based money transfers.

If US law permits activity-based rewards, global issuers including Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC) could build reward structures into high-frequency remittance corridors, effectively reducing costs for diaspora senders. USD1 is already deployed on BNB Chain, which sees significant usage across Africa and South Asia, and is listed on Binance's spot trading pairs.

Regulators in Kenya, Pakistan, Ghana, and India are tracking the CLARITY Act as a reference point for their own frameworks. Pakistan has moved quickly on the institutional side, establishing the Pakistan Crypto Council in March 2025 and building out the Pakistan Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (PVARA) to govern the sector. Nigeria, Ghana, and Kenya are among the continent's heaviest stablecoin users, with platforms such as Bitnob, Paxful, and Chipper Cash serving large portions of that demand. Kenya enacted the Virtual Asset Service Providers Act in October 2025, placing oversight under both the Central Bank of Kenya and the Capital Markets Authority. South Africa has yet to produce stablecoin-specific rules despite a 2025 Budget Review commitment. A prolonged delay in the US will extend that uncertainty globally.

Timeline

April is effectively off the table for Senate action. A committee hearing in May remains realistic, with a July floor vote representing the outer deadline before midterm campaign pressures fully consume the legislative calendar. The stablecoin market sat at roughly $300 to $320 billion in total market cap as of February 2026. How much of that grows under a yield-permissive framework, and who captures the gains, depends on whether Alsobrooks and Tillis can hold their compromise together long enough for a vote.