VERSE PRESS

Crypto News, Global First.

21Shares Files Second Amendment for Hyperliquid ETF, Pushing THYP Closer to Nasdaq

By Verse Press Research Desk | April 15, 2026

21Shares Files Second Amendment for Hyperliquid ETF, Pushing THYP Closer to Nasdaq
|

Asset manager 21Shares submitted a second amendment to its S-1 filing for a spot Hyperliquid ETF on April 15, 2026, advancing its bid to list the fund on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the ticker THYP. The filing targets HYPE, the native token of the Hyperliquid Layer-1 blockchain, and joins a crowded field of institutional products competing to bring regulated exposure to one of DeFi's highest-volume protocols to U.S. markets.

The amended filing reveals that 21Shares plans to seed the fund with 20,000 shares priced at $25 each, for a total seed basket of $500,000. Those proceeds would be used to purchase HYPE before the fund goes live. Coinbase Custody Trust Company and BitGo Trust Company will serve as custodians. The fund's fee structure has not yet been disclosed.

James Seyffart, an ETF analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, said the amendment signals forward momentum. "The amendment likely reflects feedback and comments received from the SEC, indicating that the U.S. listing process for this Hyperliquid ETF is progressing forward," he said.


Four Managers, One Token

21Shares is not alone in this race. Bitwise filed first in September 2025 and submitted its own second amendment on April 10, 2026, disclosing a 0.67% management fee for its BHYP fund, which targets NYSE Arca. Bloomberg's Eric Balchunas observed that the fee disclosure "typically means launch soon," a signal that the competitive window for HYPE products may be narrowing.

Grayscale entered the field in March 2026 with a Nasdaq filing under ticker GHYP, using Coinbase Custody for safekeeping. VanEck is pursuing both a U.S. spot staking product and a parallel European ETP. ETF analyst Nate Geraci noted the significance of four major asset managers converging on a single altcoin: "The sheer number of issuers racing to bring a HYPE product to market signals the industry sees real demand for regulated exposure to a DeFi-native protocol."

Balchunas offered a blunt explanation, commenting on the Bitwise amendment in terms analysts say apply across the issuer field: "HYPE is up 200% in the past year, so they're probably trying to strike while the iron is hot."

What makes the institutional interest notable is what Hyperliquid lacks. The protocol took no venture capital funding, ran no private sale, and gave no insider allocations. When HYPE launched via airdrop in November 2024, roughly 70% of the total supply went directly to 94,000 early users. This cohort of ETF applications is also the first to target a protocol that operates entirely on-chain, carries no centralized corporate structure, and has accepted no outside investment, leaving no insider float to unwind.


What the On-Chain Numbers Show

Hyperliquid's on-chain metrics justify the institutional attention. As of April 15, HYPE trades at approximately $43.55, giving it a market cap of around $10.38 billion and a ranking of 13th by market capitalization on CoinMarketCap. Weekly perpetual futures trading volume on the platform runs near $40.7 billion, and cumulative volume crossed $1.59 trillion between August 2025 and January 2026. The protocol holds roughly $9.57 billion in open interest and accounts for an estimated 32% to 70% of on-chain perpetuals volume, depending on the metric used. That range covers decentralized exchange volume only; when centralized exchanges are included, Hyperliquid accounts for approximately 10% of the combined market.

A built-in token buyback mechanism adds to the investment case. Approximately 97% of the platform's trading fees flow into an Assistance Fund that purchases and burns HYPE, creating a direct link between trading activity and token supply reduction. Annualized protocol revenue has exceeded $700 million.


Approval Is Not Guaranteed

Regulatory clearance faces at least one structural obstacle. Hyperliquid has no CFTC-regulated futures contracts, which the SEC has historically viewed as a prerequisite for approving spot crypto ETFs. The agency's September 2025 decision to adopt generic listing standards for crypto exchange-traded products did shorten potential timelines from 240 days to as few as 75, and a March 17, 2026 ruling classified 16 cryptocurrencies as commodities, clearing a broader path for altcoin ETFs.

The approval process also carries a structural paradox that the regulatory filings do not address: Hyperliquid currently remains officially inaccessible to U.S. residents, yet U.S. asset managers are competing to list it on U.S. exchanges. The product being designed for the U.S. market is built around a protocol that U.S. users cannot currently access directly.

On the lobbying front, the Hyperliquid Policy Center, backed by $29 million in committed funding, is actively working to secure regulatory clarity for decentralized infrastructure in Washington. Its efforts could shape the conditions under which any approved HYPE ETF would ultimately operate.

The SEC has until approximately late May 2026 to rule on Bitwise's original filing before its outer deadline expires.


A Narrow Door for Global Retail Holders

The regulatory progress carries a specific irony for users outside the United States. South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa are among the fastest-growing crypto markets globally. India alone has an estimated 60 million active users on WazirX and CoinDCX combined, and Nigeria's Binance Wallet alone serves 30 million people, with monthly user growth running at approximately 4.5%.

Traders in Lagos, Nairobi, and Accra are among Hyperliquid's most active non-Western users, partly because the protocol's no-KYC structure removes barriers common in markets with limited banking access. That same no-KYC model has driven adoption across South Asia, where access to regulated financial infrastructure varies sharply by income and geography. A U.S. ETF wrapper does nothing to extend that on-chain access to those communities.

None of those users can access a Nasdaq-listed THYP through local brokerage infrastructure. Crypto ETFs remain unavailable in India due to unresolved regulatory ambiguity involving the Reserve Bank of India and the Securities and Exchange Board of India, and most African exchanges do not connect to U.S.-listed funds. The practical benefit for these communities is indirect: sustained institutional demand may support HYPE's price and encourage regional exchanges to add deeper liquidity for the token. It may also accelerate domestic policy conversations by demonstrating that structured crypto exposure has become routine in U.S. markets.

What the ETF filing does not change is access. The communities most embedded in Hyperliquid's ecosystem are also the furthest from the product being designed to serve institutional demand for it.