South Korea Moves to Fold Crypto Into Existing Financial Rules, Bans Yield on Stablecoins
Seoul's ruling party is pushing legislation that would bring tokenized assets and stablecoins under conventional financial oversight, setting strict reserve requirements and barring interest payments to stablecoin holders.

South Korea's ruling Democratic Party of Korea announced plans this week to regulate real-world asset (RWA) tokenization and stablecoins through the country's existing financial frameworks rather than building a separate crypto-specific regime. The move, driven by the Digital Asset Basic Act (DABA) expected to pass in 2026, would include a full prohibition on yield payments to token holders and a 100% reserve requirement backed by bank deposits or government securities.
The legislation arrives as South Korea attempts to reverse nearly a decade of restrictive crypto policy. The country banned ICOs and anonymous cryptocurrency trading in 2017, though it did not eliminate cryptocurrency trading entirely. DABA would lift the ICO ban for the first time since then, provided that issuers publish white papers disclosing material project information. The bill also formally replaces the legal term "virtual assets" with "digital assets," signaling a shift in how regulators conceptualize the sector.
Stablecoin Oversight Sparks Internal Dispute
The stablecoin provisions in DABA have exposed a significant disagreement between two of South Korea's most powerful financial institutions. The Bank of Korea (BOK) wants any Korean won-pegged stablecoin to be issued only through bank-led consortia holding at least a 51% ownership stake, citing financial stability and anti-money laundering obligations. The Financial Services Commission (FSC) disagrees. It has pointed to the European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework, where 14 of 15 licensed stablecoin issuers are electronic money institutions rather than traditional banks, as evidence that rigid bank-only rules would choke fintech development. The DPK has sided with the FSC position.
Experts consulted during the DPK's legislative process were largely skeptical of the BOK's proposal. "With this governance model, difficult to achieve network effects," one industry participant said, according to reporting from KoreaTechDesk. According to CoinDesk, a summary of those same consultations found that "a majority of participating experts voiced concerns about the BOK's proposal, with many questioning whether such a framework could deliver innovation."
President Lee Jae-myung has framed a Korean won-backed stablecoin as a national strategic priority, describing it as a way to counter the global dominance of U.S. dollar-pegged tokens such as USDT and USDC. Currently, domestic stablecoin issuance remains illegal in South Korea, forcing businesses to rely on foreign alternatives. Foreign issuers hoping to operate legally under the new rules would be required to establish a domestic branch or subsidiary and meet Korean supervisory standards. Tokens from foreign issuers that do not establish a local entity would be barred from payment and remittance services entirely.
Major Korean corporate players are already positioning for the new regime. Kakao Group is developing unified digital wallets that connect KakaoPay, KakaoBank, and KakaoTalk, while Naver Financial is building a blockchain-AI hybrid platform in partnership with Dunamu, the operator of the Upbit exchange. Both Circle and Tether have filed Korean trademarks, signaling commercial interest ahead of the law's passage.
RWA Framework Takes Shape, With Centralized Controls
On the tokenized securities side, South Korea's National Assembly passed amendments to the Electronic Registration Act and the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act in January 2026. Those changes allow investment firms to intermediate RWA tokenization transactions that were previously prohibited. Full-scale operation under the new rules is set for January 2027.
Security token issuers will be required to register with the Korea Securities Depository (KSD), a mandatory central securities depository. This registration requirement applies broadly, not just to listed securities, meaning developers and issuers of private or unlisted tokenized assets face the same obligation as those working with exchange-listed instruments. Unlicensed intermediaries will be barred from handling security tokens. That centralized chokepoint contrasts with the permissionless issuance models common in decentralized finance (DeFi), and the DABA framework explicitly excludes DeFi protocols from its scope, leaving developers of decentralized applications targeting Korean users in regulatory ambiguity.
The broader global context gives Seoul's timing some urgency. On-chain RWA markets reached approximately $23.6 billion in 2026 according to DefiLlama data, representing 66% growth within the year. Tokenized funds account for roughly $10.5 billion of that total, tokenized gold and commodities contribute another $6.5 billion, and tokenized equities represent approximately $4 billion more. South Korea's own tokenized securities market is projected to reach 367 trillion won (around $249 billion) by 2030, a midpoint within a broader growth window that runs from 2026 to 2033 at a compound annual rate of 22.5%.
Regional Ripple Effects
The legislation carries implications well beyond Seoul. In South Asia, Pakistan launched a regulatory sandbox in February 2026 targeting stablecoin-based trade finance, stablecoin-based supply chain finance, tokenization of trade documents, and cross-border remittances, and is planning to tokenize up to $2 billion in state assets. South Korea's framework offers a parallel model for jurisdictions still drafting their own rules. India, despite ranking first globally in crypto adoption according to Chainalysis, imposes a flat 30% tax on crypto gains as well as a separate 1% transaction levy (TDS) and has not moved toward a comprehensive digital asset law. The broader South Asian picture is uneven: Bangladesh maintains one of the most restrictive stances in the region, comparable to China's prohibition-based approach, with no near-term policy shift anticipated, while Sri Lanka's regulatory framework remains underdeveloped.
In sub-Saharan Africa, where on-chain transaction volume exceeded $205 billion between July 2024 and June 2025 (a 52% year-over-year increase), stablecoins function as a primary tool for remittances and trade settlement. A regional adoption of South Korea's yield ban would have direct consequences for those use cases, particularly in markets where yield-bearing stablecoins have emerged as alternatives to conventional banking. Several African jurisdictions have already moved to formalize their approaches: Nigeria has classified digital assets as securities, Kenya has established a KES 500 million minimum capital requirement for stablecoin issuers, and South Africa has emerged as part of a leading regulatory bloc on the continent.
DABA is expected to receive a final vote before the end of 2026. If passed as written, it would give South Korea a comprehensive legal framework covering stablecoin issuance, security token markets, and digital asset operator liability, including a no-fault liability provision that allows users to seek compensation for losses even without proving negligence on the part of an operator.