Blockchain Association Pushes Back on Citadel's Bid to Pull DeFi Into Securities Law
The outcome of a Washington regulatory fight could determine whether millions of users in Nigeria, India, and Kenya keep access to the financial tools they rely on daily.

The Blockchain Association filed a formal letter with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Monday, urging regulators to reject a legal argument advanced by Citadel Securities that would subject decentralized finance protocol developers, open-source software authors, and self-custody wallet providers to the same registration requirements as Wall Street brokers and exchanges. The letter targets a 13-page submission Citadel sent to the SEC in December 2025, which argued that DeFi protocols trading tokenized U.S. equities function identically to registered securities exchanges and should be regulated accordingly. The Association says that reading of the law has no basis in decades of regulatory practice, judicial precedent, or the text of the Exchange Act itself.
The consequences of a ruling in Citadel's favor would land hardest not in New York or Chicago but in Lagos, Nairobi, and across India. Nigeria has approximately 25.9 million crypto users, placing it second globally in overall adoption and first in stablecoin use. Many of those users depend on non-custodial DeFi protocols for dollar access and cross-border transfers amid ongoing naira volatility. If developers of those protocols face U.S. broker-dealer obligations, many would likely shut down user-facing interfaces or geo-block African and South Asian users to limit regulatory exposure. That outcome would not be hypothetical: similar patterns emerged repeatedly during the enforcement campaign led by former SEC Chair Gary Gensler under the Biden administration. Kenya's Capital Markets Authority is currently drafting crypto legislation and would likely treat any U.S. developer-classification ruling as persuasive precedent. Kenya already faces pushback over a proposed 3 percent digital asset transaction tax that critics say could stifle growth, meaning any additional regulatory pressure transmitted through a U.S. ruling would land on already contested ground. India is navigating its own Asset Tokenization Bill 2026, a Private Member's Bill tabled by MP Raghav Chadha, and the SEC's position could inform how Indian regulators interpret activity-based obligations for local DeFi developers. Pakistan's regulators, who tend to follow guidance from international standard-setters such as IOSCO and FATF, could also be influenced by a developer-as-intermediary ruling, and such an outcome would chill Pakistani developers currently building in the DeFi space. Across Sub-Saharan Africa, stablecoin adoption sits at 9.3 percent, the highest of any region globally.
The immediate stakes center on the SEC's forthcoming "innovation exemption," a regulatory sandbox being rolled out in 2026 under the Commission's broader initiative known as Project Crypto. The exemption is designed to give eligible crypto firms and DeFi developers temporary relief from full SEC registration requirements, typically for a window of 12 to 36 months, with guardrails such as investor caps and limits on assets under management. Citadel, joined by JPMorgan Chase, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA), and law firm Cahill Gordon & Reindel at a January 28 meeting with the SEC's Crypto Task Force, argued that DeFi protocols should be excluded from that relief entirely. The coalition also called for formal rulemaking rather than ad hoc exemptions, a distinct procedural demand that would require the SEC to conduct a full notice-and-comment process before extending any relief to DeFi participants.
Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger, a former Commodity Futures Trading Commission commissioner, called Citadel's position legally unsupported. In a December 2025 statement responding to Citadel's original submission, Mersinger said: "Citadel's interpretation has no grounding in the Exchange Act, decades of Commission practice, judicial precedent, or the commonsense distinction between those who build software and those who custody assets." Mersinger also warned that forcing developers into a broker-dealer framework would push innovation out of the United States without adding any meaningful investor protection. Uniswap founder Hayden Adams was more blunt, describing Citadel as "the king of shady TradFi market makers" that "doesn't like open source, peer-to-peer tech."
Citadel's core argument is functional rather than structural. The firm contends that automated market makers (AMMs), which use non-discretionary algorithms to match buyers and sellers and determine prices, perform the same tasks as a licensed exchange, and that they collect transaction-based fees in a manner equivalent to broker-dealer compensation. Critics have noted that Citadel's argument recycles legal positions advanced by former SEC Chair Gary Gensler during his failed attempts to regulate DeFi under the Biden administration, framing the submission less as novel legal theory and more as a revival of a previously rejected regulatory posture. The Blockchain Association counters that the Exchange Act has always targeted entities that take custody of client assets and act as intermediaries between buyers and sellers, not developers who write publicly available software. Treating code authors as financial intermediaries would, the Association argues, represent an unprecedented expansion of federal securities law with no support in Congress or the courts.
The SEC issued guidance on January 29 confirming that tokenized securities, which are traditional financial instruments represented as blockchain tokens, remain subject to existing federal law. Nasdaq filed a proposed rule change on January 30 to allow tokenized securities trading on its own infrastructure, a sign that established market operators are positioning to capture the tokenized equities market themselves. The SEC also issued a no-action letter for the Depository Trust Company's tokenization pilot in early 2026, showing comfort with institutional-grade tokenization while leaving DeFi's status unresolved.
Tokenized real-world assets on public blockchains reached $23.6 billion in March 2026, up 66 percent year-to-date. Tokenized U.S. Treasuries alone hit a record $11 billion, up 27 percent year-to-date. Tokenized equities reached approximately $4.0 billion, representing roughly 16.9 percent of the total real-world asset market. That figure is central to the current dispute: it is precisely the tokenized equities segment that Citadel argues should be brought under exchange-registration rules. Total value locked across DeFi protocols stood at roughly $95.4 billion as of March 2026, according to DefiLlama.
The SEC has not indicated when it will finalize the innovation exemption framework or how it will weigh the competing submissions. The Crypto Task Force, led by Commissioner Hester Peirce, continues to accept written input. A ruling that draws a clear line between software development and financial intermediation would settle a question that has shadowed DeFi since its earliest days. A ruling that adopts Citadel's functional equivalence theory would reopen enforcement risk for developers worldwide, with the sharpest consequences felt by users in Nigeria, Kenya, India, and Pakistan, where access to dollar-denominated financial tools is often available through no other means.