VERSE PRESS

Crypto News, Global First.

Revolut Files for US National Bank Charter, Targeting Direct Access to Federal Payment Rails

Revolut submitted a de novo banking charter application to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the FDIC on March 5, 2026, seeking to establish a federally regulated national bank called Revolut Bank US, N.A. If approved, the move would position the London-based fintech to operate independently across all 50 US states without relying on Lead Bank, its current US sponsor-bank partner.

Revolut Files for US National Bank Charter, Targeting Direct Access to Federal Payment Rails
|

The application marks a significant strategic step for a company that serves more than 52 million customers across more than 40 markets worldwide and reported $4 billion in group revenues and $1.4 billion in pre-tax profit for 2024. Revolut had explored acquiring an existing US national bank as recently as mid-2025 but abandoned that path in January 2026. A Revolut spokesperson told PYMNTS that the company cited regulatory complications as the reason: buying an established bank would have required approval for a change of control and could have locked Revolut into maintaining physical branches.

"The U.S. market is critical for Revolut's global growth strategy, and our long-term plan is to establish a bank in the US," the company said in its official statement.

A de novo charter, meaning one built from scratch rather than inherited through acquisition, avoids those obligations and gives the company a clean regulatory foundation to work from.

Alongside the filing, Revolut announced a leadership transition in its US operations. Cetin Duransoy, who previously served as CEO of fintech marketplace Raisin and held senior positions at Capital One and Visa, will take over as US chief executive. Sid Jajodia, who previously led Revolut's US business, moves to a new role as Global Chief Banking Officer.

What a National Charter Actually Changes

A national bank charter issued by the OCC grants Revolut a single federal regulator covering all 50 US states under a single federal framework.

More practically, it would give Revolut direct access to Fedwire and the ACH network, the primary rails for large-value and everyday US dollar transfers. Currently, Revolut routes US transactions through Lead Bank as a sponsor-bank partner. Direct rail access would reduce the costs of intermediary bank partnerships and remove a layer of operational dependency on that arrangement.

The charter would also allow Revolut to offer lending products such as credit cards and personal loans, and would qualify US customer deposits for FDIC insurance.

Revolut's application lands in a regulatory environment that has become notably more receptive to fintech and crypto-linked entrants. Under the Trump administration, the OCC has accelerated approvals for fintech and crypto-linked applicants. The OCC received 14 de novo charter applications in 2025 alone, nearly matching the total from the previous four years combined. In December 2025, the OCC conditionally approved five crypto-focused national trust bank charters, including applications from Circle (for its First National Digital Currency Bank), Ripple, BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, and Paxos. In February 2026, Bridge (the Stripe-owned stablecoin infrastructure firm) received conditional OCC approval for a national bank trust charter, while Crypto.com received a separate conditional approval to operate as a federally regulated crypto custodian bank.

Revolut's own stablecoin activity has grown substantially alongside these broader industry trends. Crypto transaction volumes on the platform grew 50% overall in 2025, and stablecoin volume nearly doubled as a share of total Revolut payments. Stablecoin payment volumes surged approximately 156% year-over-year in 2025, reaching an estimated $10.5 billion. USDC was the most-used stablecoin by transaction volume. Ethereum accounted for over two-thirds of that activity, with Tron handling roughly 22.8%. The $100 to $500 transaction range represented 30 to 40% of all stablecoin transactions on the platform, a pattern consistent with peer-to-peer payments and cross-border remittances.

Implications for Remittance Corridors in South Asia and Africa

The US charter application carries direct relevance for users outside the United States, particularly in high-remittance markets. India receives more than $120 billion in annual remittances according to World Bank estimates, with a significant share originating from the US.

Revolut launched its Indian payments platform in October 2025 after securing a Prepaid Payment Instrument license from the Reserve Bank of India. The platform includes a branded UPI handle, a domestic Visa card, and an international multi-currency Visa card. Revolut has set a target of 20 million Indian users by 2030 and aims to process more than $7 billion in India transactions. Before launch, the platform attracted a waitlist of more than 350,000 users, indicating substantial pre-existing demand. Revolut's remittance infrastructure in India also draws on its 2022 acquisition of Arvog Forex, which grounds its ambitions in the corridor in existing operational capacity.

Direct ACH and Fedwire access through a national bank charter would allow Revolut to offer lower-cost USD-to-INR transfer corridors, competing against established services like Wise, Remitly, and Western Union. The extent to which the US charter enables stablecoin-based remittances to India depends on regulatory evolution at the Reserve Bank of India, which would need to develop a framework permitting stablecoin receipt before that channel could operate at scale.

In sub-Saharan Africa, the potential impact is similarly significant. The region carries the highest average remittance costs in the world, running between 7 and 9% per transaction according to World Bank data. Revolut has identified South Africa as its African market entry point, though the South African Reserve Bank's exchange control regime represents a noted regulatory friction for the company's operations there. The company has announced a global investment commitment of $13 billion to fund expansion across multiple regions, with Africa and Asia among the destinations.

A direct US banking presence would improve the company's ability to offer stablecoin-based remittance products to African users at lower cost than correspondent banking alternatives. Nigeria and Kenya are likely follow-on markets in the region, though Nigeria's complex regulatory history on crypto, including periods of central bank restriction alongside a developing virtual asset service provider registration framework, adds uncertainty to the expansion timeline.

What Comes Next

De novo charter applications are a lengthy process. The OCC requires applicants to demonstrate adequate capital, management experience, and a viable business plan before granting conditional approval. FDIC deposit insurance certification runs on a parallel track, and full authorization requires satisfying both agencies across multiple review stages. Revolut's 2024 financials will form part of the capitalization component of that assessment.

Revolut's application also arrives as regulators are finalizing implementing rules under the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act), the 2025 legislation establishing a federal stablecoin framework. The outcome of that rulemaking could shape whether Revolut pursues stablecoin issuance or custody under its eventual US banking license. Revolut is one of four companies selected by the UK Financial Conduct Authority to test stablecoin services under its sandbox program, giving it direct regulatory experience that may inform how it structures any future US stablecoin offerings.

The US application also proceeds against a notable backdrop: Revolut remains only conditionally licensed in its home UK market, where the Bank of England granted regulatory approval subject to deposit restrictions. Full US national bank authorization would require clearing multiple regulatory milestones that carry no guaranteed outcome, and the OCC's review process alone involves several stages before a conditional approval can be issued.