VERSE PRESS

Filecoin's First Community Grant Batch Deployed $3.68M Across 14 Teams, Then Published a Frank Post-Mortem

Filecoin's community-run ProPGF program completed its first funding batch in October 2025, distributing $3.68 million across 14 teams building storage infrastructure, developer tooling, and data onboarding tools.

Filecoin's First Community Grant Batch Deployed $3.68M Across 14 Teams, Then Published a Frank Post-Mortem
|

Filecoin's community-run ProPGF program completed its first funding batch in October 2025, distributing $3.68 million across 14 teams building storage infrastructure, developer tooling, and data onboarding tools. The program received 38 applications, shortlisted 23, and funded just under 37% of total applicants. In an October 2025 post, program coordinators Sejal Rekhan and Josh Daniels documented both the results and a list of operational failures that the team says will shape how future rounds are run.

What ProPGF Is

ProPGF, short for Proactive Public Goods Funding, is a forward-looking grants mechanism designed to complement Filecoin's separate retroactive grants program. Together, they form the network's community-controlled funding infrastructure, created to reduce the ecosystem's dependence on direct disbursements from Protocol Labs. A 12-person selection committee oversaw Batch 1 evaluations, using Questbook for grant management (the program has since migrated to Karma, accessible at app.filpgf.io) and Snapshot for governance votes. All applications and funding decisions are publicly viewable on-chain, a design choice that aligns ProPGF with similar programs at Optimism and Gitcoin. Gitcoin's quadratic funding rounds alone have distributed over $67 million to more than 5,000 projects.

Where the Money Went

Four teams received the maximum allocation of $500,000 each: FIL Ponto (a public goods coordinator focused on chain infrastructure, developer support, and integration support), CIDgravity Gateway (a data onboarding platform targeting 100 petabytes of scale with S3-compatible access and erasure coding), Curio Storage (a storage provider implementation layer), and FilCDN (a retrieval assurance service). The InterPlanetary Network Indexer, or IPNI, received $480,000. IPNI functions roughly like a directory service for content-addressed data, routing lookups between Filecoin and IPFS (the InterPlanetary File System, a peer-to-peer content distribution protocol).

Smaller grants went to projects including Fil Note ($100,000), which maps FIL lending to real-world asset certificates, and the Filecoin EconoLens MCP Server ($80,000), a natural language forecasting tool built on the Model Context Protocol. The smallest award was $25,000 to Chainfee, a network data analysis tool for miners. The average grant across all 14 teams came to roughly $263,000.

The Problems the Program Acknowledged

Rekhan and Daniels did not frame the post-mortem as a success announcement. "This first batch wasn't just about distributing funds; it was about learning how a decentralized network can coordinate experts, funders, and builders toward shared priorities," they wrote.

Six operational problems were documented publicly. Payment disbursements ran behind schedule. Teams were required to cover KYC and KYB (know-your-customer and know-your-business) compliance costs upfront before reimbursement, creating cash-flow pressure on smaller teams. Milestone documentation was duplicated across formats, adding administrative work with no clear benefit. Communications were spread across multiple platforms without a central channel. Reviewers lacked a standardized scoring rubric; separately, reviewers identified unclear funding prioritization as a consequence of that gap. And post-grant tracking relied on narrative reports rather than measurable on-chain metrics. Reviewer time ranged from 10 to 60 hours per person across the 12-member committee.

For Batch 2, the team has committed to a single communication channel, data-driven milestone metrics, a rolling reviewer model that assesses milestones on an ongoing basis rather than in batch reviews, broader scope that includes research and exploratory projects beyond infrastructure, and the integration of ProPGF and RetroPGF funding streams.

Why Regional Developers Should Pay Attention

The KYC and KYB cost issue has asymmetric effects depending on where a team is based. For developers in Nigeria, India, Kenya, or Pakistan, international compliance procedures that require upfront payment create real liquidity barriers that North American or European teams are less likely to face. The ProPGF team's public acknowledgment of this problem and stated commitment to address it in Batch 2 is a concrete signal worth noting for any regional team considering an application.

Beyond the grant process itself, several funded projects have direct relevance to infrastructure gaps in Africa and South Asia. CIDgravity Gateway lowers the barrier for onboarding large datasets to decentralized storage at a cost that industry blog XXKK puts at roughly 87% below AWS Glacier pricing (a figure sourced from XXKK and not independently verified by Verse Press), a meaningful difference in markets where cloud egress fees are a disproportionate operating cost. Titan Network, funded at $150,000 for bandwidth services and warm storage, reduces retrieval latency for storage-dependent applications in regions where that latency is a real constraint. XXKK also reports, again without independent verification, that ISP partnerships in India have reportedly reduced storage costs for Mumbai-based startups by approximately 35%, suggesting that regional deployment economics may differ substantially from global averages.

Network Context and What Comes Next

Filecoin's total stored data reached approximately 1,110 petabytes in Q3 2025, though daily new storage deals fell roughly 19% quarter over quarter to 2.8 petabytes per day. Storage utilization sits at 36% of total network capacity. FIL traded near $2.19 in Q3 2025 and reached a low near $0.79 in early February 2026 before recovering to a range of roughly $1.00 to $1.32 as of early March 2026. Grant amounts were denominated in USD equivalents rather than raw FIL, which limits token price exposure for recipients.

Batch 2, targeting $4 million in total funding, closed its application window on December 23, 2025. Funding decisions were scheduled for the week of January 30, 2026, meaning results are almost certainly already public as of this writing. Teams interested in current results and future rounds can monitor the program's updated portal at app.filpgf.io.